
Photo: Oude School, Flickr
The HR blogsite, KnowHR recently drew attention to an interview with UCLA Business Professor, Samual Culbert, reported on the NPR website.Culbert’s ideas were set out in an article in The Wall Street Journal and in a recent book “Get Rid of the Performance Review!”.
He calls the Performance Review a ”corporate sham is one of the most insidious, most damaging, and yet most ubiquitous of corporate activities.”
He suggests periodic reviews help neither employee nor employer as they fail to promote candid discussions about problems and solutions. Instead workers talk about successes and bosses retrospectively write reports which justify the level of pay award they want to pay.
In reality Culbert’s message tells us more about how managers’ behaviour impacts on the workforce, instilling fear through intimidation and deliberately manipulating performance reviews to preserve personal authority and domination in relationships.
Such organisations certainly exist, but Attractor keeps a very wide berth from them – instead working with teams which are, at the very least far “less malign”.
In describing managers’ behaviour, Culbert highlights the point few managers obtain their role due to “their keen understanding of people”, instead basing action “on self-serving logic and clumsy attempts at control”.
Culbert’s suggests removing performance reviews would facilitate a more straight-talking relationship involving a “performance preview” in which managers “just tell the employee what he or she needs to do to become more effective”. In reality then, the “performance preview” is really an effective appraisal and development review – underpinned by a positive working relationship, good leadership and management.
Top-performing leaders build working relationships which foster trust, engagement and respect within the workplace – horizontally and vertically. While the boss might have to make final decisions, there is plenty to learn from the skills, experience and perspectives of team members at all levels.
Encouraging interaction, sharing diverse and contrary views requires stout-hearted speaking and listening which – Culbert is right to point out – is not as common in the workplace as it should be. Read the rest of this entry →