You are browsing the archive for pay.

NHS Pay Freeze – Pig in a Poke?

December 13, 2010 in Pay and Reward, Public Services

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

UNISON has reported an offer from NHS Employers of a two year freeze for both pay awards and incremental progression which would secure a no compulsory redundancies deal and protection for the Agenda for Change terms and conditions.

This might reverse some local changes to employment terms made by NHS Trusts and remove a planned 1% increase in employees contributions to NHS Pensions.

UNISON have reported no compulsory redundancy agreement would apply to employees on Pay Bands 1 – 6, with more senior staff not covered.

The deal would, apparently provide staff earning less than £21k per annum would get the minimum £250 guaranteed by the government. Is this a good deal  or a pig in a poke? Read the rest of this entry →

Do Bankers Earn Their Bonuses?

October 6, 2010 in Leading and Managing Results, Pay and Reward

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Photo: rracy o, Flickr

The bonus pot for bankers has returned to the normal level according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) at £7bn (compared to £11bn in 2009).

For 2010, the government will take a larger slice of the bonus cake than bankers after the introduction of a 50% tax rate for income over £150,000.

With the backdrop of the current crisis, it is “bankers” who are facing the heaviest criticism from the public, not public servants or senior managers.

With people feeling they are being made to pay for the mistakes of bankers, it is the high bonuses being paid there which annoys people most.

Attractor has examined the issues surrounding high earnings in particular sectors before. In the past we have looked at the pay of top managers, performance pay for public servants, bonuses in public services, top public servants and public services generally. So what about bankers? Read the rest of this entry →

Pay Increases Witheld for NHS Staff

September 27, 2010 in Pay and Reward, Public Services, Workforce Management

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Central Manchester University Hospitals Trust recently announced it’s plans to withhold incremental pay increases for employees who have taken more than 18 days off sick or had four separate sick absences. This move forms part of it’s plans to save £120m by 2014 while protecting services.

The Trust was keen to point out that the new policy, being introduced from 1 October 2010, would be discretionary and would be applied in a manner that would not be discriminatory for people with long-term illnesses or those with disabilities.

NHS organisations are clearly looking for ways to save money but potential savings from implementing this policy would probably be “vanishingly small”.

UNISON officials reflected there was nothing in existing contracts providing that staff could be denied increments on the basis of absence and expressed the view NHS Trusts acting in this way would be in breach of the existing employment contracts and confirmed it would take legal action on behalf of affected staff.

In an article in Personnel Today, a legal adviser from Beachcrofts said the legality of the scheme would depend on what the staff contracts of employment say and how flexible the Trust is in applying the policy. He suggested it was unlikely the employment contracts were so prescriptive as to set out a mechanism for deciding upon pay rises and considered employers would normally have flexibility to consider a variety of factors when looking at pay rises.

So what is the position and how will the organisation fare if it proceeds without a local negotiated agreement? Read the rest of this entry →

Do The UK’s Top Public Servants Earn Their Pay?

September 22, 2010 in Pay and Reward, Public Services

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

The BBC’s Panorama programme entitled “Because We’re Worth It” explored the issues of top public servants pay, the recent government interventions and perceived value for money.

While the programme included a pretty superficial session where members of the public ranked public servants value in Trafalgar Square, it also contained some valuable insights into factors driving earnings for top public servants.

BBC researchers used the Freedom of Information Act to collate earnings information for over 38,000 top public sector roles and have published the data on their website.

The BBC explained it’s research revealed some enlightening facts about the pay of top public servants including the following -

  • 220 civil servants earned more than the Primer Minister
  • 385 teachers earned more than £100k and 17 headteachers earned more than the Prime Minister
  • 97 people at the BBC earned more than £160k
  • 428 quango heads earned more than the Prime Minister
  • the highest paid local government CEO earned £299k

Attractor has said before it is pretty meaningless to compare public servants earnings to those of the Prime Minister. Career politicians and other public servants inhabit different environments. Other commentators have highlighted the pay of senior politicians excludes the potential external earnings available in this field, before, during and after their elected service.

Panorama also highlighted the fact the Prime Minister’s pay had been reduced by both Gordon Brown and David Cameron from £197,000k to £142,000 over the last 18 months. Reducing pay in this way significantly shifts the number of top public sector roles that attract earnings above the Prime Minister …. from less than 1,000 to over 9,000.

While this sends a clear political signal on national pay restraint, and responds to similar moves made in some areas of the private sector, expecting this to translate across public service was probably no more realistic than expecting all private sector CEOs to take pay cuts.

So what else did the programme and the BBC data reveal? Read the rest of this entry →

Is Top Team Pay Unfair?

July 9, 2010 in Pay and Reward, Public Services

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Photo: Covilha, Flickr

With the government proposing a cap on public sector pay, it can’t be helpful to see reports that, according to reward consultancy MM&K, the pay for private sector Chief Executives has continued to grow while share prices have dropped.

People Management report the total reward for chief executives in the FTSE100 is now £3.1 million a year – consigning to mediocrity the comparisons between public sector managers and the Prime Minister’s salary at a mere £150k.

During a “time of austerity” with public servants experiencing a pay freeze, senior jobholders seeing pay cuts, it is challenging to hear that FTSE100 chief executives pay is up 5% on 2008 figures – at a time when the private sector has been through so much “pain”.

The median 2009 salary increase for this group was 4% and total pay has almost quadrupled since 1998. A quarter of FTSE100 companies raised CEO pay by over 7%, though about a third had no increase or took a reduced salary. The impact on senior managers pay in both the private and public sector cannot be ignored.

During the Radio 4 programme “The Moral Maze”, “Greed, Reward, Worth”, Claire Fox, from the New Economics Foundation, highlighted the unfairness of such high pay, summarising the report A Bit Rich, which challenges the link beween societal value and reward. The HR blog HR Case Studies suggested people reading the report would be either inspired or enraged.

Drawing attention to some very challenging evidence about the impact of work, the report suggests hospital cleaners, waste recycling workers and childcare workers add significant societal value while investment bankers, tax accountants and advertising executives destroy it. The report highlights the discrepancies between this societal value and levels of earnings.

The report could be criticised for using perfect hindsight in the way it describes the destruction of societal value caused by the banking sector. More relevant to the debate on pay is a lack of any discussion about labour markets. In a market economy, people can command what other people are prepared to pay for access to their skills and experience. Broadly it’s the scarcity of skills and experience which drives earnings rather than any careful calculation of “societal value”. Read the rest of this entry →

Decentralise Pay?

February 3, 2010 in Pay and Reward, Public Services

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

While bankers pay and MP’s expenses have been in the news regularly, the public sector is now a focus for attention as the scale of financial pressure becomes clear.

Should the public sector respond to increasing cost pressures with changes to pay and rewards?

From the early 1990s, changes were made to reward structures in various parts of the public sector.

Central government, local government and the NHS all experienced major shifts – even ignoring changes to public sector pensions. Read the rest of this entry →

Pay and Motivation at Kent County Council

December 21, 2009 in Leading and Managing Results, Pay and Reward, Public Services

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

iStock_000008705804XSmallKent County Council plans to “improve motivation” by paying more for superior performance.

Talks with unions aim to remove annual increments with effect from April 2010, to allow the council more scope to reward better performers at the top of their pay grade.

While performance must be a vital focus of management, performance pay does not suit every business! It is vital to understand the landscape, consider how pay acts as a motivator in the environment and culture of the business and design systems to deliver these outcomes robustly. Read the rest of this entry →

Reducing NHS Staff Sickness Costs

November 30, 2009 in Leading and Managing Results, Pay and Reward, Public Services, Workforce Management

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Phot:AnA oMeLete, Flickr

Photo:AnA oMeLete, Flickr

Salford Royal Foundation Trust recently said it would defer pay increments for staff with more than 28 days sickness during a year.

Strategic reward actions encourage positive behaviours and discourage negative ones.

While the policy may communicate intent, increments are a blunt instrument, with a lengthy time delay.

How effective might this be? Read the rest of this entry →